Re: RFC: THE OFFLINE SCHEDULER

[Mike Galbraith]

On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 14:03 -0400, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Aug 2009, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> 
> > I asked the questions I did out of pure curiosity, and that curiosity
> > has been satisfied.  It's not that I find it useless or whatnot (or that
> > my opinion matters to anyone but me;).  I personally find the concept of
> > injecting an RTOS into a general purpose OS with no isolation to be
> > alien.  Intriguing, but very very alien.
> 
> Well lets work on the isolation piece then. We could run a regular process
> on the RT cpu and switch back when OS services are needed?

If there were isolation, that would make it much less alien to _me_.
Isolation would kinda destroy the reason it was written though. RT
application/OS is injected into the network stack, which is kinda cool,
but makes the hairs on my neck stand up.

	-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/