Re: [GIT PULL] tracing/syscall for 2.6.32

[Heiko Carstens]

On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 08:34:36AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi Ingo,
> > 
> > Please pull the latest syscall tracing patches from:
> > 
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/random-tracing.git \
> > 	tracing/core
> > 
> > The tree gathers fixes, renamings and adds a new pair of tracepoints
> > for generic sysenter/sysexit tracing.
> > 
> > Some other patches are pending, beeing discussed. So there are probably
> > more to come soon.
> > 
> > Josh Stone (4):
> >       tracing: Rename FTRACE_SYSCALLS for tracepoints
> >       tracing: Make syscall tracepoints conditional
> >       tracing: Move tracepoint callbacks from declaration to definition
> >       tracing: Create generic syscall TRACE_EVENTs
> > 
> >  arch/s390/Kconfig                   |    2 +-
> >  arch/s390/defconfig                 |    2 +-
> >  arch/s390/include/asm/thread_info.h |    4 +-
> >  arch/s390/kernel/entry.S            |    2 +-
> >  arch/s390/kernel/entry64.S          |    2 +-
> >  arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c           |   12 +++---
> >  arch/x86/Kconfig                    |    2 +-
> >  arch/x86/configs/i386_defconfig     |    2 +-
> >  arch/x86/configs/x86_64_defconfig   |    2 +-
> >  arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h  |   13 +++---
> >  arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c            |   16 +++----
> >  include/linux/tracepoint.h          |   46 +++++++++--------------
> >  include/trace/define_trace.h        |    5 ++
> >  include/trace/events/syscalls.h     |   70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/trace/ftrace.h              |    9 ++++
> >  include/trace/syscall.h             |   17 --------
> >  kernel/trace/Kconfig                |    4 +-
> >  kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c       |   17 ++++----
> >  kernel/tracepoint.c                 |   20 ++++++----
> >  19 files changed, 154 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 include/trace/events/syscalls.h
> 
> Pulled, thanks!
> 
> Heiko, Martin, do the S390 bits look good to you? I have build 
> tested the S390 defconfig - it built fine beyond to pre-existing 
> warnings:

Yes, looks ok to me.

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/