[mmotm][PATCH 4/4] oom: fix oom_adjust_write() input sanity check

From: KOSAKI Motohiro
Date: Wed Aug 26 2009 - 05:37:25 EST


Andrew Morton pointed out oom_adjust_write() has very strange EIO
and new line handling. this patch fixes it.

Cc: Paul Menage <menage@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/proc/base.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
index 0c1757c..ea71cae 100644
--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -1022,21 +1022,24 @@ static ssize_t oom_adjust_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
{
struct task_struct *task;
- char buffer[PROC_NUMBUF], *end;
- int oom_adjust;
+ char buffer[PROC_NUMBUF];
+ long oom_adjust;
unsigned long flags;
+ int err;

memset(buffer, 0, sizeof(buffer));
if (count > sizeof(buffer) - 1)
count = sizeof(buffer) - 1;
if (copy_from_user(buffer, buf, count))
return -EFAULT;
- oom_adjust = simple_strtol(buffer, &end, 0);
+
+ err = strict_strtol(strstrip(buffer), 0, &oom_adjust);
+ if (err)
+ return -EINVAL;
if ((oom_adjust < OOM_ADJUST_MIN || oom_adjust > OOM_ADJUST_MAX) &&
oom_adjust != OOM_DISABLE)
return -EINVAL;
- if (*end == '\n')
- end++;
+
task = get_proc_task(file->f_path.dentry->d_inode);
if (!task)
return -ESRCH;
@@ -1055,9 +1058,8 @@ static ssize_t oom_adjust_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,

unlock_task_sighand(task, &flags);
put_task_struct(task);
- if (end - buffer == 0)
- return -EIO;
- return end - buffer;
+
+ return count;
}

static const struct file_operations proc_oom_adjust_operations = {
--
1.6.2.5



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/