Re: [PATCH] open: introduce O_NOSTD

[Ulrich Drepper]

On 08/27/2009 06:54 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> I hope that my example shows why doing it in the kernel is desirable -
> there is no safe way to keep the pre-O_CLOEXEC efficiency using just the
> library, but there IS a way to do it with kernel support:

You're describing a very special case where the performance implications 
are really minimal and try to argue that is a good enough reason?  I 
don't think so.

If a program really has to do thousands of these safe open calls then it 
can invest time into opening /dev/null for any of the unallocated 
descriptors < 3.  You can even embed this logic in the safer_open function.

--
â Ulrich Drepper â Red Hat, Inc. â 444 Castro St â Mountain View, CA â
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/