Re: linux-next: xfs tree build failure

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 11:25:09AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> 
> fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.c:63: error: static declaration of 'xfs_inobt_lookup' follows non-static declaration
> fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.h:155: note: previous declaration of 'xfs_inobt_lookup' was here
> 
> Caused by commit 2187550525d7bcb8c87689e4eca41b1955bf9ac3 ("xfs:
> rationalize xfs_inobt_lookup*").

I've sent a fix to the list about an hour ago:



Subject: [PATCH] xfs: un-static xfs_inobt_lookup
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

xfs_inobt_lookup is also used in xfs_itable.c, remove the STATIC modifier
from it's declaration to fix non-debug builds.

This was already fixed in my git tree vs the version last posted to the
list.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

Index: xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.c
===================================================================
--- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.c	2009-09-01 20:47:28.515468366 -0300
+++ xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.c	2009-09-01 20:47:33.867913011 -0300
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ xfs_ialloc_cluster_alignment(
 /*
  * Lookup a record by ino in the btree given by cur.
  */
-STATIC int				/* error */
+int					/* error */
 xfs_inobt_lookup(
 	struct xfs_btree_cur	*cur,	/* btree cursor */
 	xfs_agino_t		ino,	/* starting inode of chunk */
> 
> I have used the version of the xfs tree from next-20090901 for today.
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/


---end quoted text---
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/