Re: [tip:perfcounters/core] perf_counter: Introduce new(non-)paranoia level to allow raw tracepoint access

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Thu Sep 03 2009 - 02:47:41 EST



* Li Zefan <lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > static inline bool perf_paranoid_cpu(void)
> > {
> > return sysctl_perf_counter_paranoid > 0;
> > @@ -3971,6 +3977,7 @@ static const struct pmu *tp_perf_counter_init(struct perf_counter *counter)
> > * have these.
> > */
> > if ((counter->attr.sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_RAW) &&
> > + && perf_paranoid_tracepoint_raw() &&
>
> "&& &&"
>
> This leads to build failure.

Yeah - fixed that yesterday, forgot to push out :-/

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/