[tip:perfcounters/core] x86, perf_counter, bts: Do not allow kernel BTS tracing for now

[tip-bot for markus.t.metzger@xxxxxxxxx]

Commit-ID:  1653192f510bd8114b7b133d7289e6e5c3e95046
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/1653192f510bd8114b7b133d7289e6e5c3e95046
Author:     markus.t.metzger@xxxxxxxxx <markus.t.metzger@xxxxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 16:04:48 +0200
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
CommitDate: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 09:26:40 +0200

x86, perf_counter, bts: Do not allow kernel BTS tracing for now

Kernel BTS tracing generates too much data too fast for us to
handle, causing the kernel to hang.

Fail for BTS requests for kernel code.

Signed-off-by: Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zjilstra@xxxxxxxxx>
LKML-Reference: <20090902140616.901253000@xxxxxxxxx>
[ This is really a workaround - but we want BTS tracing in .32
  so make sure we dont regress. The lockup should be fixed
  ASAP. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>


---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c |   11 +++++++++--
 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
index 3776b0b..f9cd084 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
@@ -984,8 +984,15 @@ static int __hw_perf_counter_init(struct perf_counter *counter)
 	 * Branch tracing:
 	 */
 	if ((attr->config == PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS) &&
-	    (hwc->sample_period == 1) && !bts_available())
-		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	    (hwc->sample_period == 1)) {
+		/* BTS is not supported by this architecture. */
+		if (!bts_available())
+			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+		/* BTS is currently only allowed for user-mode. */
+		if (hwc->config & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_OS)
+			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	}
 
 	hwc->config |= config;
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/