Re: [PATCH 0/6] perf trace: Add filter support

[Frederic Weisbecker]

On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 09:06:49AM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> >> An example:
> >>
> >>  #./perf record -f -e irq:irq_handler_entry:irq==18:record
> >>  or
> >>  #./perf record -f -e irq:irq_handler_entry:irq==18 -R
> >>  ^C
> > 
> > We may want to write complex filters. While looking at this patchset,
> > that seems possible this way, but the raw line may become unreadable:
> > 
> > perf record -f -e irq:irq_handler_entry:"irq==18 && (name == 'foo' || bar == 'blah')":record
> > 
> > May be we should add an option to let one also set the filters seperately then
> > we could do:
> > 
> > perf record -f -e -R irq:irq_handler_entry --filter "irq==18 && (name == 'foo' || bar == 'blah')"
> > 
> 
> I had the same idea. ;)
> 
> But using this option, is it possible to specify different filters
> for different events? like this:
> 
> perf record -f -e -R irq:irq_handler_entry --filter "irq==18"
> -e irq:softirq_entry --filter "vec==1"
> 


Exactly how I was imagining it :)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/