Re: [PATCH] tracing/filters: use strcmp() instead of strncmp()

From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Mon Sep 07 2009 - 22:54:47 EST


Li,

I'm going through some old email, and I came across this patch. It seems
that it never got applied. Could you port this to the latest -tip tree
and resend it.

Sorry about missing it.

Thanks,

-- Steve


On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 13:53 +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> Trace filter is not working normally:
>
> # echo 'name == et' > tracing/events/irq/irq_handler_entry/filter
> # echo 1 > tracing/events/irq/irq_handler_entry/enable
> # cat trace_pipe
> <idle>-0 [001] 1363.423175: irq_handler_entry: irq=18 handler=eth0
> <idle>-0 [001] 1363.934528: irq_handler_entry: irq=18 handler=eth0
>
> It's because we pass to trace_define_field() the information of
> __str_loc_##item, but not the actual string, so pred->str_len == field->size
> == sizeof(unsigned short), thus it always compare at most 2 bytes when
> filtering on __string() field.
>
> Since __string() is dynamic size, we are not able to set field->size to
> string length. Alternatively this patch uses strcmp() instead of strncmp(),
> for both static strings and dynamic strings. strncmp() is not necessary,
> since strings passed to it are already guaranteed to be NULL-terminated.
>
> [ Impact: make filter facility working normally for dynamic strings ]
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace.h | 1 -
> kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c | 7 ++-----
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.h b/kernel/trace/trace.h
> index 6e735d4..ec8970b 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace.h
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.h
> @@ -758,7 +758,6 @@ struct filter_pred {
> filter_pred_fn_t fn;
> u64 val;
> char str_val[MAX_FILTER_STR_VAL];
> - int str_len;
> char *field_name;
> int offset;
> int not;
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c
> index a854eed..8362586 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c
> @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ static int filter_pred_string(struct filter_pred *pred, void *event,
> char *addr = (char *)(event + pred->offset);
> int cmp, match;
>
> - cmp = strncmp(addr, pred->str_val, pred->str_len);
> + cmp = strcmp(addr, pred->str_val);
>
> match = (!cmp) ^ pred->not;
>
> @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ static int filter_pred_strloc(struct filter_pred *pred, void *event,
> char *addr = (char *)(event + str_loc);
> int cmp, match;
>
> - cmp = strncmp(addr, pred->str_val, pred->str_len);
> + cmp = strcmp(addr, pred->str_val);
>
> match = (!cmp) ^ pred->not;
>
> @@ -341,7 +341,6 @@ static void filter_clear_pred(struct filter_pred *pred)
> {
> kfree(pred->field_name);
> pred->field_name = NULL;
> - pred->str_len = 0;
> }
>
> static int filter_set_pred(struct filter_pred *dest,
> @@ -576,7 +575,6 @@ static int filter_add_pred(struct filter_parse_state *ps,
> fn = filter_pred_string;
> else
> fn = filter_pred_strloc;
> - pred->str_len = field->size;
> if (pred->op == OP_NE)
> pred->not = 1;
> return filter_add_pred_fn(ps, call, pred, fn);
> @@ -957,7 +955,6 @@ static struct filter_pred *create_pred(int op, char *operand1, char *operand2)
> }
>
> strcpy(pred->str_val, operand2);
> - pred->str_len = strlen(operand2);
>
> pred->op = op;
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/