Re: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements

[Ingo Molnar]

* Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 08 2009, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 11:13 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > And here's a newer version.
> > 
> > I tinkered a bit with your proglet and finally found the 
> > problem.
> > 
> > You used a single pipe per child, this means the loop in 
> > run_child() would consume what it just wrote out until it got 
> > force preempted by the parent which would also get woken.
> > 
> > This results in the child spinning a while (its full quota) and 
> > only reporting the last timestamp to the parent.
> 
> Oh doh, that's not well thought out. Well it was a quick hack :-) 
> Thanks for the fixup, now it's at least usable to some degree.

What kind of latencies does it report on your box?

Our vanilla scheduler default latency targets are:

  single-core: 20 msecs
    dual-core: 40 msecs
    quad-core: 60 msecs
    opto-core: 80 msecs

You can enable CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG=y and set it directly as well via 
/proc/sys/kernel/sched_latency_ns:

   echo 10000000 > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_latency_ns

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/