[RFC][PATCH 3/7] writeback: merge for_kupdate and !for_kupdate requeue io logics

From: Wu Fengguang
Date: Wed Sep 09 2009 - 11:09:04 EST


Unify the logic for kupdate and non-kupdate cases.
There won't be starvation because the inodes requeued into b_more_io or
b_more_io_wait will later be spliced _after_ the remaining inodes in b_io,
hence won't stand in the way of other inodes in the next run.

CC: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Martin Bligh <mbligh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michael Rubin <mrubin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <wfg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 39 ++++++---------------------------------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

--- linux.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c 2009-09-09 20:47:11.000000000 +0800
+++ linux/fs/fs-writeback.c 2009-09-09 20:48:01.000000000 +0800
@@ -426,45 +426,18 @@ writeback_single_inode(struct inode *ino
} else if (mapping_tagged(mapping, PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY)) {
/*
* We didn't write back all the pages. nfs_writepages()
- * sometimes bales out without doing anything. Redirty
- * the inode; Move it from b_io onto b_more_io/b_dirty.
+ * sometimes bales out without doing anything.
*/
- /*
- * akpm: if the caller was the kupdate function we put
- * this inode at the head of b_dirty so it gets first
- * consideration. Otherwise, move it to the tail, for
- * the reasons described there. I'm not really sure
- * how much sense this makes. Presumably I had a good
- * reasons for doing it this way, and I'd rather not
- * muck with it at present.
- */
- if (wbc->for_kupdate) {
+ inode->i_state |= I_DIRTY_PAGES;
+ if (wbc->nr_to_write <= 0) {
/*
- * For the kupdate function we move the inode
- * to b_more_io so it will get more writeout as
- * soon as the queue becomes uncongested.
+ * slice used up: queue for next turn
*/
- inode->i_state |= I_DIRTY_PAGES;
- if (wbc->nr_to_write <= 0) {
- /*
- * slice used up: queue for next turn
- */
- requeue_io(inode);
- } else {
- /*
- * somehow blocked: retry later
- */
- redirty_tail(inode);
- }
+ requeue_io(inode);
} else {
/*
- * Otherwise fully redirty the inode so that
- * other inodes on this superblock will get some
- * writeout. Otherwise heavy writing to one
- * file would indefinitely suspend writeout of
- * all the other files.
+ * somehow blocked: retry later
*/
- inode->i_state |= I_DIRTY_PAGES;
redirty_tail(inode);
}
} else if (atomic_read(&inode->i_count)) {

--

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/