Re: [PATCH 00/72] Blackfin updates for 2.6.32

[Daniel Walker]

On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 18:17 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> 
> this code i had rewritten and as fallout, the style changed.  looks
> fine to me, and no, this particular checpatch "error" is not always
> worthwhile (like in this case).

Have you read Documentation/CodingStyle ? Can you better explain why
your don't want to follow that document ? Most people accept that to be
the style of code in Linux, and that is what checkpatch checks for..

We also have this quote from Documentation/SubmittingPatches

"4) Style check your changes.

Check your patch for basic style violations, details of which can be
found in Documentation/CodingStyle.  Failure to do so simply wastes
the reviewers time and will get your patch rejected, probably
without even being read.

At a minimum you should check your patches with the patch style
checker prior to submission (scripts/checkpatch.pl).  You should
be able to justify all violations that remain in your patch."

If you ultimately don't correct these changes, I'd ask that in the
future you submit pull requests for the blackfin architecture instead of
sending individual patches ..

Daniel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/