Re: [PATCH 2/4] virtual block device driver (ramzswap)

From: Ed Tomlinson
Date: Tue Sep 15 2009 - 07:45:30 EST


On Tuesday 15 September 2009 03:30:23 you wrote:
> > So, its extremely difficult to wait for the proper fix.
>
> Then make ramzswap depend on !CONFIG_ARM. In any case, CONFIG_ARM bits
> really don't belong into drivers/block.

Problem is that ramzswap is usefull on boxes like the n800/n810... So this is a bad
suggestion from my POV. How about a comment saying this code goes when the
fix arrives???

Ed Tomlinson
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/