[tip:sched/core] sched: Fix double_rq_lock() compile warning

From: tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
Date: Wed Sep 16 2009 - 06:19:46 EST


Commit-ID: b78bb868c54bebbf8d8786a3f8320700d6d2b864
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/b78bb868c54bebbf8d8786a3f8320700d6d2b864
Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:23:18 +0200
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
CommitDate: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:01:01 +0200

sched: Fix double_rq_lock() compile warning

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>


---
kernel/sched.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index e27a536..17e4391 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -119,8 +119,6 @@
*/
#define RUNTIME_INF ((u64)~0ULL)

-static void double_rq_lock(struct rq *rq1, struct rq *rq2);
-
static inline int rt_policy(int policy)
{
if (unlikely(policy == SCHED_FIFO || policy == SCHED_RR))
@@ -1695,6 +1693,8 @@ static inline void update_shares_locked(struct rq *rq, struct sched_domain *sd)

#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT

+static void double_rq_lock(struct rq *rq1, struct rq *rq2);
+
/*
* fair double_lock_balance: Safely acquires both rq->locks in a fair
* way at the expense of forcing extra atomic operations in all
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/