Re: [PATCH] fix BUILD_BUG_ON() and a couple of bogus uses of it

From: David Miller
Date: Thu Sep 17 2009 - 20:01:51 EST


From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:24:37 -0700

> sparc64:
>
> In file included from arch/sparc/kernel/vio.c:17:
> /usr/src/devel/arch/sparc/include/asm/vio.h: In function `vio_dring_avail':
> /usr/src/devel/arch/sparc/include/asm/vio.h:261: error: bit-field `<anonymous>' width not an integer constant
>
> static inline u32 vio_dring_avail(struct vio_dring_state *dr,
> unsigned int ring_size)
> {
> BUILD_BUG_ON(!is_power_of_2(ring_size));
>
> return (dr->pending -
> ((dr->prod - dr->cons) & (ring_size - 1)));
> }
>
> changing it to MAYBE_BUILD_BUG_ON seems to have fixed it.

That's completely bogus.

First of all, arch/sparc/kernel/vio.c never calls this function
so it should never be evaluated.

Second of all, all the places that do call this function only
pass pure constants as the 'ring_size' parameter.

drivers/block/sunvdc.c:

static inline u32 vdc_tx_dring_avail(struct vio_dring_state *dr)
{
return vio_dring_avail(dr, VDC_TX_RING_SIZE);
}

drivers/net/sunvnet.c:

static inline u32 vnet_tx_dring_avail(struct vio_dring_state *dr)
{
return vio_dring_avail(dr, VNET_TX_RING_SIZE);
}

Making this MAYBE_BUILD_BUG_ON shouldn't be necessary.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/