Re: [PATCH 3/3] tracing/events: use list_for_entry_continue

[Steven Rostedt]

On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 17:09 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 02:07:05PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> > Simplify s_next() and t_next().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Nice.
> I wonder if that can be even more simplified with
> the following existing seq helpers:
> 
> extern struct list_head *seq_list_start(struct list_head *head,
> 		loff_t pos);
> extern struct list_head *seq_list_start_head(struct list_head *head,
> 		loff_t pos);
> extern struct list_head *seq_list_next(void *v, struct list_head *head,
> 		loff_t *ppos);

This could be another patch someday.

> 
> 
> That said, it's already a nice cleanup.
> 

I'll take this as an Acked-by then?

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/