Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class

[Dhaval Giani]

>>
>> An alternative is starting the child out with 0 runtime, and have the
>> parent run sched_setscheduler() on it giving us a clear point to run
>> admission on.
>>
> I thought this too, we just have to chose whether the 'more natural' or,
> let's say 'user friendly', behaviour is...
>

I agree with Peter here. It makes more sense to start it with a 0
runtime, because anyway whenever you will fork, you will be under
controlled conditions and know how much bandwidth you need. I think we
should just let userspace handle this part.

Thanks,
Dhaval

-- 

Marie von Ebner-Eschenbach  - "Even a stopped clock is right twice a
day." - http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/m/marie_von_ebnereschenbac.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/