Re: [PATCH] sched: Make sure task has correct sched_class after policychange

From: Peter Williams
Date: Wed Sep 23 2009 - 08:40:36 EST


On 23/09/09 16:32, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 02:21 +0000, Peter Williams wrote:
From the code in rt_mutex_setprio(), it is evident that the intention
is that task's with a RT 'prio' value as a consequence of receiving a PI
boost also have their 'sched_class' field set to '&rt_sched_class'.
However, the code in __setscheduler() could result in this intention
being frustrated.

This patch fixes this problem.

Signed-off-by: Peter Williams<pwil3058@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I think you're right, but the problem seems to be that it sets
sched_class based on policy, which seems fragile in the face of PI.

How about the alternative below?

Yes, that's what I meant to do i.e. use p->prio in the if condition. I sent a second patch with a fix but your solution is neater :-).


---
kernel/sched.c | 17 ++++-------------
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 91843ba..753a52c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -6129,23 +6129,14 @@ __setscheduler(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int policy, int prio)
{
BUG_ON(p->se.on_rq);

- p->policy = policy;
- switch (p->policy) {
- case SCHED_NORMAL:
- case SCHED_BATCH:
- case SCHED_IDLE:
- p->sched_class =&fair_sched_class;
- break;
- case SCHED_FIFO:
- case SCHED_RR:
- p->sched_class =&rt_sched_class;
- break;
- }
-
p->rt_priority = prio;
p->normal_prio = normal_prio(p);
/* we are holding p->pi_lock already */
p->prio = rt_mutex_getprio(p);
+ if (rt_prio(p->prio))
+ p->sched_class =&rt_sched_class;
+ else
+ p->sched_class =&fair_sched_class;
set_load_weight(p);
}

Peter
--
Peter Williams pwil3058@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
-- Ambrose Bierce
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/