Re: [PATCH] WARN_ONCE(): use bool for boolean flag

From: Cesar Eduardo Barros
Date: Sun Sep 27 2009 - 13:49:40 EST


Daniel Walker escreveu:
On Sun, 2009-09-27 at 14:24 -0300, Cesar Eduardo Barros wrote:

I took a quick look, and all uses seem to be directly in a boolean context (within an if()), so there would be no problem. Besides, the unlikely() all these macros end with does a double negation, meaning even if it is an int, it will be either 0 or 1 (but I am not sure I am reading these macros right - it seems CONFIG_TRACE_BRANCH_PROFILING turns all unlikely() into likely()).

In fact, I was expecting no change at all, since gcc should be able to see it is being treated as a boolean (perhaps I am trusting gcc too much). And to make matters even more confusing, my own test changing all __ret_warn_once to bool and dropping the !! caused an _increase_ of 598 bytes (x86-64 defconfig).

text data bss dec hex filename
8100553 1207148 991988 10299689 9d2929 vmlinux.warnret.before
8101119 1207180 991988 10300287 9d2b7f vmlinux.warnret.after

(And yes, data increased again.)

Did you have the CONFIG_TRACE_BRANCH_PROFILING option enabled for the
test above?

CONFIG_BRANCH_PROFILE_NONE=y

CONFIG_TRACE_BRANCH_PROFILING does not even appear in the .config.

If this was just your regular base line config , then that is odd .. I
also would think worse case would be no size reduction .. I did my
compile test on x86-32 btw..

Yes, it is very odd. And I tried compiling a small test module to see if I could see the changes in the assembly output:

#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>

void test(int value)
{
WARN_ON_ONCE(value);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(test);

But the assembly output is identical.

I will try looking at the first function which shows a difference in size (which appears to be handle_irq) and see what I can find.

--
Cesar Eduardo Barros
cesarb@xxxxxxxxxx
cesar.barros@xxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/