RE: [PATCH 2.6.32-rc1] net: VMware virtual Ethernet NIC driver:vmxnet3

From: Shreyas Bhatewara
Date: Wed Sep 30 2009 - 21:19:04 EST


Stephen,

Thanks for taking a look.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:shemminger@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 5:39 PM
> To: Shreyas Bhatewara
> Cc: linux-kernel; netdev; Stephen Hemminger; David S. Miller; Jeff
> Garzik; Anthony Liguori; Chris Wright; Greg Kroah-Hartman; Andrew
> Morton; virtualization; pv-drivers
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.32-rc1] net: VMware virtual Ethernet NIC
> driver: vmxnet3
>
> On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:34:57 -0700 (PDT)
> Shreyas Bhatewara <sbhatewara@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Note: your patch was linewrapped again
>

Fixed the alpine option. Should not happen again.

> > +
> > +
> > +static void
> > +vmxnet3_declare_features(struct vmxnet3_adapter *adapter, bool
> dma64)
> > +{
> > + struct net_device *netdev = adapter->netdev;
> > +
> > + netdev->features = NETIF_F_SG |
> > + NETIF_F_HW_CSUM |
> > + NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_TX |
> > + NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX |
> > + NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_FILTER |
> > + NETIF_F_TSO |
> > + NETIF_F_TSO6;
> > +
> > + printk(KERN_INFO "features: sg csum vlan jf tso tsoIPv6");
> > +
> > + adapter->rxcsum = true;
> > + adapter->jumbo_frame = true;
> > +
> > + if (!disable_lro) {
> > + adapter->lro = true;
> > + printk(" lro");
> > + }
>
> Why not use NETIF_F_LRO and ethtool to control LRO support?

Yes, that would be a better way to do it. I will make that change.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/