[023/136] eCryptfs: Prevent lower dentry from going negative during unlink

From: Greg KH
Date: Thu Oct 01 2009 - 21:58:35 EST


2.6.31-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------
From: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit 9c2d2056647790c5034d722bd24e9d913ebca73c upstream.

When calling vfs_unlink() on the lower dentry, d_delete() turns the
dentry into a negative dentry when the d_count is 1. This eventually
caused a NULL pointer deref when a read() or write() was done and the
negative dentry's d_inode was dereferenced in
ecryptfs_read_update_atime() or ecryptfs_getxattr().

Placing mutt's tmpdir in an eCryptfs mount is what initially triggered
the oops and I was able to reproduce it with the following sequence:

open("/tmp/upper/foo", O_RDWR|O_CREAT|O_EXCL|O_NOFOLLOW, 0600) = 3
link("/tmp/upper/foo", "/tmp/upper/bar") = 0
unlink("/tmp/upper/foo") = 0
open("/tmp/upper/bar", O_RDWR|O_CREAT|O_NOFOLLOW, 0600) = 4
unlink("/tmp/upper/bar") = 0
write(4, "eCryptfs test\n"..., 14 <unfinished ...>
+++ killed by SIGKILL +++

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ecryptfs/+bug/387073

Reported-by: Loïc Minier <loic.minier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Serge Hallyn <serue@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: ecryptfs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>

---
fs/ecryptfs/inode.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

--- a/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c
@@ -476,6 +476,7 @@ static int ecryptfs_unlink(struct inode
struct inode *lower_dir_inode = ecryptfs_inode_to_lower(dir);
struct dentry *lower_dir_dentry;

+ dget(lower_dentry);
lower_dir_dentry = lock_parent(lower_dentry);
rc = vfs_unlink(lower_dir_inode, lower_dentry);
if (rc) {
@@ -489,6 +490,7 @@ static int ecryptfs_unlink(struct inode
d_drop(dentry);
out_unlock:
unlock_dir(lower_dir_dentry);
+ dput(lower_dentry);
return rc;
}



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/