Re: [.32-rc3] scheduler: iwlagn consistently high in "waiting forCPU"

From: Mike Galbraith
Date: Thu Oct 08 2009 - 00:07:27 EST


On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 20:34 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 October 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Tuesday 06 October 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> > > I've checked for 2.6.31.1 now and iwlagn is listed high there too when
> > > the system is idle, but with normal values of 60-100 ms. And phy0 has
> > > normal values of below 10 ms.
> > > I've now rebooted with today's mainline git; phy0 now frequently shows
> > > with values of around 100 ms too (i.e. higher than last time).
> >
> > Mike privately sent me a script to try to capture the latencies with
> > perf, but the perf output does not show any high latencies at all. It
> > looks as if we may have found a bug in latencytop here instead.
>
> Not sure if it's relevant nor what it means, but I frequently see two lines
> for iwlagn, e.g:
>
> Scheduler: waiting for cpu 102.4 msec 99.7 %
> . 3.3 msec 0.3 %
>
> I get the same results with both latencytop 0.4 and 0.5.

OK, I see latencytop spikes here on an idle box too, to the tune of up
to a _second_. Booting with nohz=off seems to have cured it.

I wanted to see if that's also the perf sched record -C N trouble I
warned you not to try when recording with script, but unfortunately,
after pulling this morning...

marge:/root/tmp # perf sched lat --sort=max
Segmentation fault

...perf sched got busted. Seems likely to be same thing for both
though, as magnitude/frequency of bogons is very similar.

-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/