Re: [PATCH 1/2] vmscan: separate sc.swap_cluster_max and sc.nr_max_reclaim

[Rik van Riel]

KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> Rafael, Can you please review this patch series?
>
> I found shrink_all_memory() is not fast at all on my numa system.
> I think this patch series fixes it.
>
>
> ==============================================================
> Currently, sc.scap_cluster_max has double meanings.
>
>  1) reclaim batch size as isolate_lru_pages()'s argument
>  2) reclaim baling out thresolds
>
> The two meanings pretty unrelated. Thus, Let's separate it.
> this patch doesn't change any behavior.
>
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>

--
All rights reversed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/