Re: [PATCH 1/1] perf tools: Move threads & last_match to threads.c

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Mon Oct 12 2009 - 05:13:16 EST



* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> This was just being copy'n'pasted all over.
>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c | 18 +++++++-----------
> tools/perf/builtin-report.c | 17 +++++++----------
> tools/perf/builtin-sched.c | 15 ++++++---------
> tools/perf/builtin-trace.c | 9 +++------
> tools/perf/util/thread.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> tools/perf/util/thread.h | 12 ++++--------
> 6 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)

hm, mind refreshing this against latest -tip? It doesnt apply anymore:

Hunk #2 FAILED at 635.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 1036.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 1052.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 1122 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #6 succeeded at 1651 (offset 65 lines).
Hunk #7 succeeded at 1657 (offset -2 lines).
3 out of 7 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
patching file tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
patching file tools/perf/util/thread.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 6.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 55.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 62 (offset -4 lines).
Hunk #4 FAILED at 84.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 197 (offset -14 lines).
3 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file tools/perf/util/thread.c
patching file tools/perf/util/thread.h
Hunk #1 FAILED at 15.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- rejects in file tools/perf/util/thread.h

or have i missed some prereq patch?

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/