Re: [PATCH 2/5] [PATCH 2/5] tracing: export symbols for kernellock tracepoints

[Frederic Weisbecker]

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 04:33:51PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The big kernel lock tracepoints are used inside modules and they need
> to be exported accordingly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  lib/kernel_lock.c |    2 ++
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/kernel_lock.c b/lib/kernel_lock.c
> index 4ebfa5a..76f05bc 100644
> --- a/lib/kernel_lock.c
> +++ b/lib/kernel_lock.c
> @@ -139,3 +139,5 @@ void __lockfunc _unlock_kernel(const char *func, const char *file, int line)
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(_lock_kernel);
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(_unlock_kernel);
>  
> +EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL(lock_kernel);
> +EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL(unlock_kernel);
> -- 


I remember when you showed me this patch, and it fixed a real
issue because we had the tracepoint call in smp_lock.h:

#define lock_kernel()	\
	trace_lock_kernel(__FUNC__, __FILE__, __LINE__);	\
	_lock_kernel();						\

So indeed the modules needed this missing export. But I had
to move the tracepoint calls to lib/kernel_lock.c instead,
because we had very bad headers dependencies.

So it's not needed anymore.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/