Re: [PATCH] kernel.h: Add a never optimized away pr_dbg forprintk(KERN_DEBUG pr_fmt(fmt)...)

[Joe Perches]

On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 21:28 -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> The pr_dbg_* variations seem reasonable if the current pr_debug() were 
> changed to pr_dbg().

I think that's unlikely to happen.

> this discussion is irrelevant if there 
> are no current use cases (in which case the patch is pointless).

Yeah, right.  It's alway irrelevant to add new
facilities when where are no current use cases.

I sent a 21 deep patchset over a week ago.
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/10/4/198


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/