Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm: move inc_zone_page_state(NR_ISOLATED) to just isolated place

From: KOSAKI Motohiro
Date: Wed Oct 14 2009 - 21:55:43 EST


> On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 10:06:58 +0900 (JST)
> KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > This patch series is trivial cleanup and fix of page migration.
> >
> >
> > ==========================================================
> >
> > Christoph pointed out inc_zone_page_state(NR_ISOLATED) should be placed
> > in right after isolate_page().
>
> The bugfixes are appropriate for 2.6.32 and should be backported into
> -stable too, I think. I haven't checked to see how long those bugs
> have been present.
>
> The cleanup is more appropriate for 2.6.33 so I had to switch the order
> of these patches. Hopefully the bugfixes were not dependent on the
> cleanup.

Yes, each patches are independent.
[1/3] is cleanup.
[2/3] and [3/3] are bugfixes.

I'm sorry for lack of prudence of patch order.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/