Re: [patch 0/2] x86, UV: fixups for configurations with a largenumber of nodes.

[Ingo Molnar]

* Robin Holt <holt@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> We need the __uv_hub_info structure to contain the correct values for 
> n_val, gpa_mask, and lowmem_remap_*.  The first patch in the series 
> accomplishes this.  Could this be included in the stable tree as well. 
> Without this patch, booting a large configuration hits a problem where 
> the upper bits of the gnode affect the pnode and the bau will not 
> operate.

i've applied this one.

> The second patch cleans up the broadcast assist unit code a small bit.

Seems to be more than just a 'cleanup'. It changes:

  uv_nshift = uv_hub_info->m_val;

to (in essence):

              uv_hub_info->m_val & ((1UL << uv_hub_info->n_val) - 1)

which is not the same. Furthermore, the new inline is:

+       return gpa >> uv_hub_info->m_val & ((1UL << uv_hub_info->n_val) - 1);

note that >> has higher priority than bitwise & - is that intended? I 
think the intention was:

+       return gpa >> (uv_hub_info->m_val & ((1UL << uv_hub_info->n_val) - 1));

in any case please do that cleaner by adding a separate mask variable.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/