Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Add a new generic section in perf.data

[Ingo Molnar]

* Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> +/*
> + * Version 0: contains trace_info section only
> + */
> +struct perf_file_additionals {
> +	u64				version;
> +	struct perf_file_section	trace_info;
> +};

i dont disagree with the change - but it would be even nicer to simply 
define a features bitmask, instead of a flat version - and add the 
trace_info section as a feature.

That way it's all a lot more manageable: we dont know about versions per 
se, we know about features. Individual features could be developed (and 
backported) in a distributed way - without having to worry about a flat 
version model.

So i'd suggest something like a bitmask in the perf.data file header:

	DECLARE_BITMAP(features, 256);

Plus every perf version knows about the features it supports:

	DECLARE_BITMAP(features_supported, 256);

The compatibility rule is: perf only touches attributes that belong to 
features it knows about.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/