Re: [RFC/PATCH] ratelimit: make output more useful

[Joe Perches]

On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 17:12 +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am Freitag 23 Oktober 2009 16:55:09 schrieb Ingo Molnar:
> > Any reason why it couldnt be pushed inside printk.c? We just need the
> > func string - not the pointer pass-in. That would also address some of
> > the call-site bloat.

[]

> +extern int __printk_ratelimit(const char *func);
> +#define printk_ratelimit() __printk_ratelimit(__func__)

Perhaps check if CONFIG_KALLSYMS is defined and use

%pS ... __builtin_return_address(0) ?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/