linux-next: manual merge of the percpu tree with the kgdb tree

From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Fri Oct 30 2009 - 04:20:50 EST


Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the percpu tree got a conflict in
kernel/softlockup.c between commit
b460e1994445b5ebb97aaec0c29f893c246bd830 ("softlockup: add
sched_clock_tick() to avoid kernel warning on kgdb resume") from the kgdb
tree and commit 1871e52c76dd95895caeb772f845a1718dcbcd75 ("percpu: make
percpu symbols under kernel/ and mm/ unique") from the percpu tree.

Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the
changes as necessary.

I do wonder if the local variable name changes in the percpu tree change
were a good idea?

I also needed a further merge fixup (see further below).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

diff --cc kernel/softlockup.c
index a85ace2,d225790..0000000
--- a/kernel/softlockup.c
+++ b/kernel/softlockup.c
@@@ -125,15 -117,7 +125,15 @@@ void softlockup_tick(void
return;
}

- if (touch_timestamp == 0) {
+ if (touch_ts == 0) {
+ if (unlikely(softlock_touch_sync[this_cpu])) {
+ /*
+ * If the time stamp was touched atomically
+ * make sure the scheduler tick is up to date.
+ */
+ softlock_touch_sync[this_cpu] = 0;
+ sched_clock_tick();
+ }
__touch_softlockup_watchdog();
return;
}

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:58:07 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] percpu: merge fixup for variable renaming

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/softlockup.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/softlockup.c b/kernel/softlockup.c
index 560a01d..57f1295 100644
--- a/kernel/softlockup.c
+++ b/kernel/softlockup.c
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ static int softlock_touch_sync[NR_CPUS];
void touch_softlockup_watchdog_sync(void)
{
softlock_touch_sync[raw_smp_processor_id()] = 1;
- __raw_get_cpu_var(touch_timestamp) = 0;
+ __raw_get_cpu_var(softlockup_touch_ts) = 0;
}

void touch_all_softlockup_watchdogs(void)
--
1.6.5.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/