Re: FatELF patches...

From: Ryan C. Gordon
Date: Fri Oct 30 2009 - 10:54:42 EST

Next message: Eric Dumazet: "Re: WARNING: at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:154 inet_sock_destruct"
Previous message: Tony Lindgren: "Re: linux-next: manual merge of the omap tree with Linus' tree"
In reply to: Rayson Ho: "Re: FatELF patches..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Can we first find out whether it is safe from a legal point of view??
> After the SCO v. IBM lawsuit, we should be way more careful.

Does anyone have a spare patent lawyer? I'm not against changing my patch
to work around a patent, but not knowing _how_ to change it, or if it
needs changing at all? That's maddening.

--ryan.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Eric Dumazet: "Re: WARNING: at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:154 inet_sock_destruct"
Previous message: Tony Lindgren: "Re: linux-next: manual merge of the omap tree with Linus' tree"
In reply to: Rayson Ho: "Re: FatELF patches..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]