Re: WARNING: at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:154 inet_sock_destruct

From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Fri Oct 30 2009 - 10:56:00 EST


Francis Moreau a écrit :
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> This oops occurring again and again with SUNRPC finally gave me the right pointer.
>>>
>>> David, we added two years ago memory accounting to UDP, and this changed
>>> requirements about calling skb_free_datagram() in the right context.
>>>
>>> I wish we had an ASSERT_SOCK_LOCKED() debugging facility :(
>>>
>>> Francis, would you please test following patch ?
>> I'm applying it and testing it during a couple of days and see if
>> something wrong still happens.
>
> Hmm, with the patch applied on a 2.6.32-rc5, my machine locks hard
> when starting nfsd.
>

Please ignore/revert the last part of the patch (about net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c)

In xs_udp_data_ready() we really want to call skb_free_datagram(),
not skb_free_datagram_locked(), because socket is already locked.

Thanks

diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
index 37c5475..d61be4a 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
@@ -883,7 +883,7 @@ static void xs_udp_data_ready(struct sock *sk, int len)
out_unlock:
spin_unlock(&xprt->transport_lock);
dropit:
+ skb_free_datagram(sk, skb);
- skb_free_datagram_locked(sk, skb);
out:
read_unlock(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
}

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/