Re: [PATCH] kprobes: Sanitize struct kretprobe_instance allocations

From: Masami Hiramatsu
Date: Fri Oct 30 2009 - 15:56:05 EST


Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote:
From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli<ananth@xxxxxxxxxx>

For as long as kretprobes have existed, we've allocated NR_CPUS
instances of kretprobe_instance structures. With the default value of
CONFIG_NR_CPUS increasing on certain architectures, we are potentially
wasting kernel memory.

See http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10839#c3 for more
details.

Use a saner num_possible_cpus() instead of NR_CPUS for allocation.

Signed-off-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli<ananth@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks!

---
kernel/kprobes.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6.32-rc5/kernel/kprobes.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.32-rc5.orig/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ linux-2.6.32-rc5/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -1014,9 +1014,9 @@ int __kprobes register_kretprobe(struct
/* Pre-allocate memory for max kretprobe instances */
if (rp->maxactive<= 0) {
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
- rp->maxactive = max(10, 2 * NR_CPUS);
+ rp->maxactive = max(10, 2 * num_possible_cpus());
#else
- rp->maxactive = NR_CPUS;
+ rp->maxactive = num_possible_cpus();
#endif
}
spin_lock_init(&rp->lock);

--
Masami Hiramatsu

Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America), Inc.
Software Solutions Division

e-mail: mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/