Re: [PATCH] update fix X86_64 procfs provide stack information forthreads

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Tue Nov 03 2009 - 03:29:13 EST



* Stefani Seibold <stefani@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> This patch fix two issues in the procfs stack information on X86_64
> linux.
>
> The 32 bit loader compat_do_execve did not store stack start (this was
> figured out by alexey).
>
> The stack information on a X64_64 kernel always show 0 kbyte stack
> usage, because of a miss implemented KSTK_ESP macro which always return
> -1. The new implementation returns now the right value.
>
> The patch is against 2.6.32-rc5-git5.
>
> Andrew would you so kind to apply this patch?
>
> Greetings,
> Stefani
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefani Seibold <stefani@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 8 +++++++-
> arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 8 ++++++++
> fs/compat.c | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- linux-2.6.32-rc5/fs/compat.c 2009-10-16 02:41:50.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.32-rc5.new/fs/compat.c 2009-11-02 09:00:52.871909633 +0100
> @@ -1532,6 +1532,8 @@
> if (retval < 0)
> goto out;
>
> + current->stack_start = current->mm->start_stack;
> +
> /* execve succeeded */
> current->fs->in_exec = 0;
> current->in_execve = 0;
> --- linux-2.6.32-rc5/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h 2009-10-16 02:41:50.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.32-rc5.new/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h 2009-11-02 10:39:47.177909657 +0100
> @@ -1000,7 +1001,13 @@
> #define thread_saved_pc(t) (*(unsigned long *)((t)->thread.sp - 8))
>
> #define task_pt_regs(tsk) ((struct pt_regs *)(tsk)->thread.sp0 - 1)
> -#define KSTK_ESP(tsk) -1 /* sorry. doesn't work for syscall. */
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION
> +extern unsigned long KSTK_ESP(struct task_struct *task);
> +#else
> +#define KSTK_ESP(task) ((task)->thread.usersp)
> +#endif
> +
> #endif /* CONFIG_X86_64 */
>
> extern void start_thread(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long new_ip,
> --- linux-2.6.32-rc5/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c 2009-10-16 02:41:50.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.32-rc5.new/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c 2009-11-02 10:48:23.614936810 +0100
> @@ -664,3 +669,11 @@
> return do_arch_prctl(current, code, addr);
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION
> +unsigned long KSTK_ESP(struct task_struct *task)
> +{
> + return (test_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_IA32)) ? \
> + (task_pt_regs(task)->sp) : \
> + ((task)->thread.usersp);
> +}
> +#endif

That's quite ugly. The KSTK_ESP() function should be unconditional and
the #ifdef should be eliminated. If CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION is turned off
(whichis rare) then TIF_IA32 wont be set so the function should work
fine.

Thanks,

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/