Re: [PATCH]: use spin_lock_irqsave in try_one_irq()

[Prarit Bhargava]

Yong Zhang wrote:
> From 83ee4c7591aae764f1656bd68f6e95ae112e2e7a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 20:52:45 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] genirq: try_one_irq() should be called with irq disabled
>
> Prarit report this:
>   

<snip>

Testing verifies that this patch works.

P.

> Reported-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  kernel/irq/spurious.c |    2 ++
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/spurious.c b/kernel/irq/spurious.c
> index 114e704..bd7273e 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/spurious.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/spurious.c
> @@ -121,7 +121,9 @@ static void poll_all_shared_irqs(void)
>  		if (!(status & IRQ_SPURIOUS_DISABLED))
>  			continue;
>
> +		local_irq_disable();
>  		try_one_irq(i, desc);
> +		local_irq_enable();
>  	}
>  }
>
>   
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/