Re: [PATCH 00/41] rewritten rt2800 drivers

[Julian Calaby]

Bart,

FWIW, this all looks good to me, except for these comments:

1. When you introduce struct rt2800_ops, it may telegraph your
intentions more clearly if you introduce rt2800lib.h at the same time
- this also means that we don't have (if only for a single patch)
duplicate versions of this structure and it's associated code.

2. Patches #26-28 should arguably come before the conversions to use
the struct rt2800_ops methods.

3. I don't get the reasoning behind patch #37 (remove useless ifdefs
from rt2x00leds.h) but I'm going to assume that it's all right.

4. Patch #39 should arguably come earlier in the patch set as it's a
general cleanup.

Other than that, good work!

Thanks,

-- 

Julian Calaby

Email: julian.calaby@xxxxxxxxx
.Plan: http://sites.google.com/site/juliancalaby/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/