Re: [RFC] Mount point suggestions for cgroup

[KOSAKI Motohiro]

> On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 01:25:46PM -0800, Paul Menage wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Matt Helsley <matthltc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > If anything, "standardizing" the mount point(s) will likely provide a false
> > > sense of uniformity and we'll get some bad userspace scripts/tools that
> > > break when "nonstandard" usage appears. Leaving the mount point undefined
> > > forces anyone writing scripts or tools to consider whether they want to be
> > > portable and, if so, the proper way to find the cgroup hierarchies they need
> > > to manipulate.
> > 
> > Scanning /proc/mounts to find the relevant mount locations is pretty
> > simple, for code that's just wanting to use existing cgroup mounts.
> > But for the code that sets up mounts in the first place, its probably
> > helpful to have recommendations of suitable locations.
> 
> libcgroup uses a configuration file specified by the user to do this.

You are right.
But fixed mount point help to make quick cute script for sys-admin.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/