Re: [BUGFIX][PATCH] oom-kill: fix NUMA consraint check with nodemask v2

From: KOSAKI Motohiro
Date: Tue Nov 10 2009 - 02:24:39 EST


Hi

> ===================================================================
> --- mmotm-2.6.32-Nov2.orig/mm/oom_kill.c
> +++ mmotm-2.6.32-Nov2/mm/oom_kill.c
> @@ -196,27 +196,40 @@ unsigned long badness(struct task_struct
> /*
> * Determine the type of allocation constraint.
> */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> static inline enum oom_constraint constrained_alloc(struct zonelist *zonelist,
> - gfp_t gfp_mask)
> + gfp_t gfp_mask, nodemask_t *nodemask)
> {
> -#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> struct zone *zone;
> struct zoneref *z;
> enum zone_type high_zoneidx = gfp_zone(gfp_mask);
> - nodemask_t nodes = node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY];
> + int ret = CONSTRAINT_NONE;
>
> - for_each_zone_zonelist(zone, z, zonelist, high_zoneidx)
> - if (cpuset_zone_allowed_softwall(zone, gfp_mask))
> - node_clear(zone_to_nid(zone), nodes);
> - else
> + /*
> + * The nodemask here is a nodemask passed to alloc_pages(). Now,
> + * cpuset doesn't use this nodemask for its hardwall/softwall/hierarchy
> + * feature. Then, only mempolicy use this nodemask.
> + */
> + if (nodemask && nodes_equal(*nodemask, node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]))
> + ret = CONSTRAINT_MEMORY_POLICY;

!nodes_equal() ?


> +
> + /* Check this allocation failure is caused by cpuset's wall function */
> + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, zonelist,
> + high_zoneidx, nodemask)
> + if (!cpuset_zone_allowed_softwall(zone, gfp_mask))
> return CONSTRAINT_CPUSET;

If cpuset and MPOL_BIND are both used, Probably CONSTRAINT_MEMORY_POLICY is
better choice.



>
> - if (!nodes_empty(nodes))
> - return CONSTRAINT_MEMORY_POLICY;
> -#endif
> + /* __GFP_THISNODE never calls OOM.*/
>
> + return ret;
> +}
> +#else
> +static inline enum oom_constraint constrained_alloc(struct zonelist *zonelist,
> + gfp_t gfp_mask, nodemask_t *nodemask)
> +{
> return CONSTRAINT_NONE;
> }
> +#endif


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/