Re: lpj=x loops_per_jiffy option enhancements

[Luis R. Rodriguez]

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The lpj argument seems nice but it seems busted for SMP. I was
> wondering since this is a common thing for some embedded devices can't
> we just stuff the lpj somewhere after our first boot and remove this
> as an option?
>
> Where we store it ? I don't know... we managed to store an image for
> suspend, seems we can find a place for lpj, no?

And only do it for UP boxen, and *always* do it for them. Or is the
lpj expected to change over time on a box?

  Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/