Re: [PATCH 22/23] sysctl arm: Remove binary sysctl support

[Eric W. Biederman]

Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> Can you name one binary sysctl value that gets accessed more
>> than a few times during the execution of a vaguely common
>> application? We're talking about microseconds for typically
>> write-once or read-once settings.
>
> For example shell scripts tend to execute programs quite a lot.
>
>> The question is just how many sysctl values you regard as both
>> common and performance critical.
>
> Very little, I suspect in fact it's only one.

I just took a second look, attempting to figure out how much startup
overhead my sysctl used.  I failed because I don't have a user space
old enough that it calls sysctl. I had to go back all of the way to
glibc-2.4 to find a version of nptl that calls sysctl at startup.
glibc-2.5 on i386 uses uname and all other architectures uses either
assumes smp is true or false without performing a system call.

I don't believe an inuse version of glibc exists that uses sysctl
except the ioperm implementation on arm.  So I can't see how being
a little slower will impact anyone.

Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/