Re: [patch] x86: reduce srat verbosity in the kernel log

[Ingo Molnar]

* David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, 13 Nov 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > > It's possible to reduce the number of SRAT messages emitted to the kernel
> > > log by printing each valid pxm once and then creating bitmaps to represent
> > > the apic ids that map to the same node.
> > > 
> > > This reduces lines such as
> > > 
> > > 	SRAT: PXM 0 -> APIC 0 -> Node 0
> > > 	SRAT: PXM 0 -> APIC 1 -> Node 0
> > > 	SRAT: PXM 1 -> APIC 2 -> Node 1
> > > 	SRAT: PXM 1 -> APIC 3 -> Node 1
> > > 
> > > to
> > > 
> > > 	SRAT: PXM 0 -> APIC {0-1} -> Node 0
> > > 	SRAT: PXM 1 -> APIC {2-3} -> Node 1
> > > 
> > > The buffer used to store the apic id list is 128 characters in length.
> > > If that is too small to represent all the apic id ranges that are bound
> > > to a single pxm, a trailing "..." is added.  APICID_LIST_LEN should be
> > > manually increased for such configurations.
> > > 
> > > Acked-by: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c |   41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > >  drivers/acpi/numa.c   |    5 +++++
> > >  include/linux/acpi.h  |    3 ++-
> > >  3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
> > > --- a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
> > > @@ -36,6 +36,9 @@ static int num_node_memblks __initdata;
> > >  static struct bootnode node_memblk_range[NR_NODE_MEMBLKS] __initdata;
> > >  static int memblk_nodeid[NR_NODE_MEMBLKS] __initdata;
> > >  
> > > +static DECLARE_BITMAP(apicid_map, MAX_LOCAL_APIC) __initdata;
> > > +#define APICID_LIST_LEN	(128)
> > > +
> > >  static __init int setup_node(int pxm)
> > >  {
> > >  	return acpi_map_pxm_to_node(pxm);
> > > @@ -136,8 +139,6 @@ acpi_numa_x2apic_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_x2apic_cpu_affinity *pa)
> > >  	apicid_to_node[apic_id] = node;
> > >  	node_set(node, cpu_nodes_parsed);
> > >  	acpi_numa = 1;
> > > -	printk(KERN_INFO "SRAT: PXM %u -> APIC %u -> Node %u\n",
> > > -	       pxm, apic_id, node);
> > >  }
> > >  
> > >  /* Callback for Proximity Domain -> LAPIC mapping */
> > > @@ -170,8 +171,40 @@ acpi_numa_processor_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_cpu_affinity *pa)
> > >  	apicid_to_node[apic_id] = node;
> > >  	node_set(node, cpu_nodes_parsed);
> > >  	acpi_numa = 1;
> > > -	printk(KERN_INFO "SRAT: PXM %u -> APIC %u -> Node %u\n",
> > > -	       pxm, apic_id, node);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +void __init acpi_numa_print_srat_mapping(void)
> > > +{
> > > +	char apicid_list[APICID_LIST_LEN];
> > > +	int i, j;
> > > +
> > > +	for (i = 0; i < MAX_PXM_DOMAINS; i++) {
> > > +		int len;
> > > +		int nid;
> > > +
> > > +		nid = pxm_to_node(i);
> > > +		if (nid == NUMA_NO_NODE)
> > > +			continue;
> > > +
> > > +		bitmap_zero(apicid_map, MAX_LOCAL_APIC);
> > > +		for (j = 0; j < MAX_LOCAL_APIC; j++)
> > > +			if (apicid_to_node[j] == nid)
> > > +				set_bit(j, apicid_map);
> > > +
> > > +		if (bitmap_empty(apicid_map, MAX_LOCAL_APIC))
> > > +			continue;
> > > +
> > > +		/*
> > > +		 * If the bitmap cannot be listed in a buffer of length
> > > +		 * APICID_LIST_LEN, then it is suffixed with "...".
> > > +		 */
> > > +		len = bitmap_scnlistprintf(apicid_list, APICID_LIST_LEN,
> > > +					   apicid_map, MAX_LOCAL_APIC);
> > > +		pr_info("SRAT: PXM %u -> APIC {%s%s} -> Node %u\n",
> > > +			i, apicid_list,
> > > +			(len == APICID_LIST_LEN - 1) ? "..." : "",
> > > +			nid);
> > > +	}
> > >  }
> > 
> > No. As i suggested many times before, just get rid of the printouts or 
> > make them boot-debug-flag dependent.
> > 
> 
> Hmm, so even if these were dependent on a kernel parameter, do you think 
> this patch would still be needed exactly as it is written?  In other 
> words, do you believe that Mark's system should really emit 1272 lines for 
> this data instead of the 40 with this patch?
> 
> I'm all for making this dependent on a kernel parameter, but it's a 
> seperate change than what this patch is addressing.  We need the apic 
> id mappings because they aren't exposed to userspace in any other way, 
> they need to exported somehow and this is a clear improvement to 
> reduce verbosity in the kernel log.
>
> So I really don't know what you're insisting here, you want this 
> compression to be accompanied by another patch which makes the call to 
> acpi_numa_print_srat_mapping() depend on a kernel parameter?  Or are 
> you saying we shouldn't compress it at all and Mike should just deal 
> with 1272 lines instead of 40?  Or are you saying we should export 
> this static information via sysfs?

There's two problems outlined in this discussion:

 A) too verbose bootup that is annoying with 64 CPUs and a show-stopper
    with 4096 CPUs.

 B) the ad-hoc nature of our topology enumeration. Some of it is in
    /sys, some of it is in printk logs. None really works well and 
    there's no structure in it.

The simplest solution for (A) is what i suggested a few mails ago: dont 
print the information by default, but allow (for trouble-shooting) 
purposes for it to be printed when a boot option is passed.

Problem (B), topology info enumeration of a successful bootup is a 
different matter. It should be exposed to user-space via proper /sys 
abstractions, not via ad-hoc printks. There's ongoing work in that area, 
from Andreas Hermann, with patches posted. hpa expressed the view there 
that topology structure should be expressed via a nice vfs abstraction - 
i share that opinion.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/