Re: [PATCH 3/4] security/selinux: decrement sizeof size in strncmp

[Joe Perches]

On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 03:44 +0000, David Wagner wrote:
> I personally don't find
>     strncmp(foo, "constant", sizeof("constant"))        // first snippet
> to be more readable, auditable, or obviously correct than
>     strcmp(foo, "constant").                            // second snippet
> Is there a technical basis for arguing that the first
> snippet is better than the second snippet?

I don't think there is.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/