Re: [BUGFIX -v3 for .32] crypto, gcm, fix another complete call incomplete fuction

[Herbert Xu]

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 03:39:11PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> The flow of the complete function (xxx_done) in gcm.c is as follow:
> 
> void complete(struct crypto_async_request *areq, int err)
> {
> 	struct aead_request *req = areq->data;
> 
> 	if (!err) {
> 		err = async_next_step();
> 		if (err == -EINPROGRESS || err == -EBUSY)
> 			return;
> 	}
> 
> 	complete_for_next_step(areq, err);
> }
> 
> But *areq may be destroyed in async_next_step(), this makes
> complete_for_next_step() can not work properly. To fix this, one of
> following methods is used for each complete function.
> 
> - Add a __complete() for each complete(), which accept struct
>   aead_request *req instead of areq, so avoid using areq after it is
>   destroyed.
> 
> - Expand complete_for_next_step().
> 
> The fixing method is based on the idea of Herbert Xu.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx>

Applied to crypto-2.6.  Thanks a lot!
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/