Re: [PATCH 08/21] scheduler: implement force_cpus_allowed_ptr()

From: Tejun Heo
Date: Tue Nov 17 2009 - 00:19:52 EST


11/17/2009 02:14 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:45:13 am Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Implement force_cpus_allowed_ptr() which is similar to
>> set_cpus_allowed_ptr() but bypasses PF_THREAD_BOUND check and ignores
>> cpu_active() status as long as the target cpu is online. This will be
>> used for concurrency-managed workqueue.
>
> Can we drop the silly _ptr() postfix? It was a hack someone added to
> avoid churning set_cpus_allowed(), and no need to repeat here.

Yeah, it's an ugly name. I'll drop it from the new function.

Thanks.

--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/