Re: [Bug #14354] Bad corruption with 2.6.32-rc1 and upwards

[tytso]

On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:23:11PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> I wasn't quite sure what the status was, because there was some
> activity in the bug entry after it had been marked as resolved.

Yeah, the actual regression had been resolved (by changing the
default), but the root cause was due to the fact that not enough
people had done proper power-fail testing for the journal_checksum,
even though the code had been in the kernel for a very long time.  The
discussion afterwards was focused around fixing those problems so we
could make journal_checksum be the default at some point in the future.

      	   		       	   	      - Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/