Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86: Limit the number of processor bootup messages

[Mike Travis]

Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:29 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 11/17/2009 12:10 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > > > The following lines have been removed:
> > > >
> > > >        CPU: Physical Processor ID:
> > > >        CPU: Processor Core ID:
> > > >        CPU %d/0x%x -> Node %d
> > > please don't.
> > Why not?
> >
> > Or, more formally: please state the rationale for keeping them.
> at least one distribution: SLES 11 mess it up when BSP is from socket
> 1 instead of socket0
>
> and above message does show kernel think BSP still from socket0, and
> other cores in that package are from socket1.

[    1.601924] Booting Node   0, Processors  #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 Ok.

How does one imply Socket 1 from Node 0?

I added the socket and core id for BSP.  I think cluttering up output
with useless additional information that is easily available is not
worthwhile.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/