Re: [tip:timers/urgent] hrtimer: Fix /proc/timer_list regression

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> i've bisected back to it:
> 
> | 887a29f59b93cf54e21814869a4ab6e80b6fa623 is the first bad commit
> | commit 887a29f59b93cf54e21814869a4ab6e80b6fa623
> | Author: Feng Tang <feng.tang@xxxxxxxxx>
> | Date:   Thu Sep 3 16:32:53 2009 +0800
> |
> |    hrtimer: Fix /proc/timer_list regression
> 
> Config attached.
> 
> I've removed it from timers/urgent for now.

Come on, this is a patently wrong conclusion.

We call timer_stats_update_stats() which returns on top of the
function due to:

	if (likely(!timer_stats_active))
		return;

timer_stats_active is 0 during boot and you can only activate it by
writing to /proc/timer_stats which you certainly did not at this
point.

Can you please explain how a call to a function which returns right
away can cause that problem ? 

That patch unearthed some other bug and your revert is just papering
over that fact.

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/