Re: [PATCHSET] workqueue: prepare for concurrency managedworkqueue, take#2

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Sat Nov 21 2009 - 07:09:00 EST


On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 12:37 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 11/20/2009 01:46 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > 0001-sched-kvm-fix-race-condition-involving-sched_in_pree.patch
> > 0002-workqueue-Add-debugobjects-support.patch
> > 0003-sched-rename-preempt_notifier-to-sched_notifier-and-.patch
> > 0004-sched-update-sched_notifier-and-add-wakeup-sleep-not.patch
> > 0005-sched-implement-sched_notifier_wake_up_process.patch
> > 0006-scheduler-implement-force_cpus_allowed.patch
> > 0007-acpi-use-queue_work_on-instead-of-binding-workqueue-.patch
> > 0008-stop_machine-reimplement-without-using-workqueue.patch
> > 0009-workqueue-misc-cosmetic-updates.patch
> > 0010-workqueue-merge-feature-parametesr-into-flags.patch
> > 0011-workqueue-update-cwq-alignement-and-make-one-more-fl.patch
> > 0012-workqueue-define-both-bit-position-and-mask-for-work.patch
> > 0013-workqueue-separate-out-process_one_work.patch
> > 0014-workqueue-temporarily-disable-workqueue-tracing.patch
>
> I'm pushing out 0001-0014 to linux-next via the following tree.
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/wq.git for-next
>
> I intend to keep the tree stable from this point on unless drastic
> change is necessary. I'll posting further patches against the above
> tree.

05 is a full nak and needs reimplementing.
06 at the very least needs a changelog.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/