Re: newidle balancing in NUMA domain?

[Ingo Molnar]

* Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> > .32 is kind of closed, with us being at -rc8.
> 
> It's a bad regression though.

It's about 3 months too late for that. Ideally we want performance 
regressions to be looked for and reported when the patches go into the 
devel tree. Failing that, -rc1 would be the good time to re-test 
whatever workload you care about.

If you cannot test it in a regular fashion you can offload the testing 
to us, by adding a similar/equivalent workload to 'perf bench sched'. 
We'll make sure it stays sane.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/